On Pension Reform
Live Blogging #oakdebates | On Pension Reform | 7:35pm
Nyeisha DeWitt wants “collaborative reform” and says with the
right leadership it is possible to solve.
Muhammad suggest that a parcel tax might be feasible to fund a pension
program, but he mentions that “more study is needed.” Miller-Cole thinks that
pensions “should not be put to a vote” and that we should be thinking about the
individual that the pensions support, mainly “widows of officers.” Lynette
Gibson McElhaney says “a promise is a promise” and that growing the economy is
the key to solving the problem. Sullivan
says that “kicking the problem to 2024” isn’t feasible and that “we should make
payments on this debt.”
Labels: #oakdebates, city council, district 3
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home