On Improving Public Safety + Gang Injunctions
Live Blogging #oakdebates | 7:21pm
Juarez: does not believe in gang injunctions, says they are “costly and not effective.”
Juarez: does not believe in gang injunctions, says they are “costly and not effective.”
McMahan: is also against the gang injunctions, says that its
part of the “us against them mentality” and queries the audience on “how Is the
drug war going?” ends with saying a more “innovative approach” is required.
Garza: says that she is “between it” has met many people [former
gang members] that have “changed their life” and the policy doesn’t work for
them anymore. She wants something that “works for everyone.”
Gallo: says that we will “either be serious about safety or
we are not” points out that seniors in the neighborhoods are unable to “enjoy their
retirement” because of violence in the District. Gallo says that he “supports
injunctions for violent offenders” and needs “all the tools possible to give to
law enforcement” to improve safety in Oakland and that the “time for excuses is
over.”
Labels: #oakdebates, city council, district 5
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home